Jim Galloway of the AJC reports on the inevitable fight that is forming in regards to Gov. Nathan Deal's announcement that he is ready to go after the sales taxes that should accompany purchases Georgians make over the internet.
Deal's announcement got a response from Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, who refined his definition of what constitutes a tax increase. According to Norquist, if a government expands its tax collection system, and takes in more cash as a result, then it's a tax increase. That seems like a poor definition of a tax increase. I'm of the opinion that broad base and low rates are the best ways to tax and an increase in the base while lowering the rate would not necessarily be a tax increase.
Deal's office resonded by reiterating that this isn't a tax increase but an effort to collect taxes that are already law. "It's current law that all retail sales are supposed to pay a sales tax", said Deal spokesman Brian Robinson.
Robinson is referring to the
Georgia Consumer Use Tax. The use tax applies when sales tax has not been charged for goods purchased for use or consumption in the state of Georgia. Purchases made over the Internet, by phone or out of state are some examples of transactions that would be subject to the use tax.
I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other whether companies that have no physical presence in Georgia should be tasked with collecting and remitting sales tax for sales to Georgians, but I feel it is misleading if not downright incorrect to label Georgia's attempt to collect such already enacted taxes as a tax increase.